"Free" surveillance technology often comes at a hidden cost to communities, including long-term data-sharing commitments and recurring fees. This technology can be acquired through federal grants, vendor trials, philanthropic donations, or private funding, bypassing public oversight and transparency requirements. These systems integrate into federal data pipelines, potentially compromising sanctuary protections and local control over surveillance practices. Rejecting such "free" tech outright is the best protection; if already in place, clear rules on use, retention, sharing, ownership, transparency, and consequences for misuse must be established to mitigate risks.
Read the full article at EFF Deeplinks
Want to create content about this topic? Use Nemati AI tools to generate articles, social posts, and more.
