The analysis and experiments conducted on skills for AI agents like Claude reveal several critical insights regarding their effectiveness, cost, and limitations:
Key Insights
-
Encoded Preferences vs. Capability Uplift
- Skills that teach an encoded preference (idiomatic ways of doing things) are more likely to have a longer shelf life than those providing new capabilities the model didn't previously know.
- The evals showed that the skill was effective in guiding the model towards preferred idioms and patterns for Angular state management using
@ngrx/signals.
-
Triggering Behavior
- The description optimization loop revealed that no matter how the skill's description is rephrased, the agent still under-triggers on conversational queries.
- This means that even if a skill provides valuable information, it may not be consulted frequently enough to justify its inclusion.
-
Cost Implications
- Each invocation of a skill incurs additional time and token costs:
- Time: 13.7 seconds increase per call
- Tokens: 12,416 tokens increase per call
- At the current pricing model ($3/M input, $15/M output), this translates to an extra cost
- Each invocation of a skill incurs additional time and token costs:
Read the full article at DEV Community
Want to create content about this topic? Use Nemati AI tools to generate articles, social posts, and more.

![[AINews] The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Closing the Loop](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.nemati.ai%2Fmedia%2Fblog%2Fimages%2Farticles%2F600e22851bc7453b.webp&w=3840&q=75)



