The Supreme Court is grappling with how to handle "legislative facts" in cases like Monsanto v. Durnell, where general factual questions are intertwined with legal disputes. This matters because it affects who—judges, juries, or other bodies—is best suited to decide such facts, influencing the outcomes of constitutional and regulatory litigation. Courts must clarify procedural rules for handling these facts to ensure fair judicial administration and consistent case resolution.
Read the full article at SCOTUSblog
Want to create content about this topic? Use Nemati AI tools to generate articles, social posts, and more.
4
Tags
Ali NematiWritten by Ali
